This is a 9-page non-technical yet somewhat sketchy article (arXiv:2311.02233) which purports to resolve the quantum measurement paradox by first identifying its classical counterpart. I am posting it here in an attempt to collect some feedback from experts, hopefully spark some discussion, get a chance to clarify any unclear points for the readers and for myself — or face a refutation.
Latest Issues
IJQF Supplement
Most Viewed
- On Testing the Simulation Theory (17,783)
- 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem (3,612)
- Latest Papers on Quantum Foundations (2,153)
- OBITUARY FOR HEINZ-DIETER ZEH (1932 — 2018) (1,948)
- Non-Relativistic Limit of the Dirac Equation (1,853)
- International Journal of Quantum Foundations (1,715)
- Review of “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Exploration of the Physical Meaning of Quantum Theory” (1,381)
- Taking Heisenberg’s Potentia Seriously (1,341)
- Probabilistic Bohmian Quantum Mechanics and Non-standard Analysis (1,132)
- The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics (1,099)