Primary Menu Search
  • Aims & Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Content
  • Book Reviews
  • Supplement
  • Members
  • Submit
  • Contact IJQF

International Journal of Quantum Foundations

An online forum for exploring the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity

You are here: Home ∼ A live alternative to quantum spooks

A live alternative to quantum spooks

Published by International Journal of Quantum Foundations on January 2, 2020

Volume 6, Issue 1, pages 1-8

Huw Price [Show Biography] and Ken Wharton [Show Biography]

Huw Price is Bertrand Russell Professor of Philosophy and a Fellow of Trinity College. He is Academic Director of the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, and was co-founder with Martin Rees and Jaan Tallinn of the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk. In January 2019 he joined the inaugural Board of the new Ada Lovelace Institute. Before moving to Cambridge in 2011 he was ARC Federation Fellow and Challis Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sydney, where he was founding Director of the Centre for Time.

Educated at Stanford and UCLA, Ken Wharton has been a professor in the department of Physics and Astronomy at San Jose State University since 2001. After getting tenure in 2006, he switched over from experimental laser-plasma physics to the more daring field of quantum foundations. His research is centered on developing locally-mediated models of quantum phenomena, including quantum entanglement, using future constraints as an explanatory resource.

Quantum weirdness has been in the news recently, thanks to an ingenious new experiment by a team led by Roland Hanson, at the Delft University of Technology. Much of the coverage presents the experiment as good (even conclusive) news for spooky action-at-a-distance, and bad news for local realism. We point out that this interpretation ignores an alternative, namely that the quantum world is retrocausal. We conjecture that this loophole is missed because it is confused for superdeterminism on one side, or action-at-a-distance itself on the other. We explain why it is different from these options, and why it has clear advantages, in both cases.

Full Text Download (117k)

Posted in Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2020 Tagged Original Paper

Article written by International Journal of Quantum Foundations

International Journal of Quantum Foundations

← Previous Next →

Latest Issues

  • Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 2, April 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 3, July 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 4, October 2022
  • Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2023

IJQF Supplement

  • Volume 4, Issue 1, April 2022
  • Volume 4, Issue 2, July 2022
  • Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2023

IJQF Members

Newest | Active | Popular
  • Profile picture of editor
    editor
    active 1 day, 15 hours ago
  • Avatar
    Peter Holland
    active 2 days, 5 hours ago
  • Avatar
    Michael Dickson
    active 5 years, 5 months ago
  • Avatar
    Marco Genovese
    active 2 days, 8 hours ago
  • Profile picture of David Deutsch
    David Deutsch
    Not recently active

IJQF Forums

Newest | Active | Popular | Alphabetical
  • Group logo of 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem
    2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem
    active 1 month, 4 weeks ago
  • Group logo of 2018 Workshop on Wigner’s Friend
    2018 Workshop on Wigner’s Friend
    active 3 years, 6 months ago
  • Group logo of 2016 International Workshop on Quantum Observers
    2016 International Workshop on Quantum Observers
    active 3 years, 10 months ago
  • Group logo of 2015 International Workshop on Quantum Foundations
    2015 International Workshop on Quantum Foundations
    active 4 years, 6 months ago
  • Group logo of John Bell Workshop 2014
    John Bell Workshop 2014
    active 5 years ago
  • Group logo of 2017 International Workshop: Collapse of the Wave Function
    2017 International Workshop: Collapse of the Wave Function
    active 5 years ago

Most Viewed

  • On Testing the Simulation Theory (15,771)
  • 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem (3,286)
  • Latest Papers on Quantum Foundations (1,938)
  • Non-Relativistic Limit of the Dirac Equation (1,579)
  • OBITUARY FOR HEINZ-DIETER ZEH (1932 — 2018) (1,568)
  • International Journal of Quantum Foundations (1,325)
  • Review of “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Exploration of the Physical Meaning of Quantum Theory” (1,140)
  • Taking Heisenberg’s Potentia Seriously (1,024)
  • The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics (913)
  • On testing the simulation hypothesis (881)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Primary Menu

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Content
  • Book Reviews
  • Supplement
  • Members
  • Submit
  • Contact IJQF

Copyright © 2023 International Journal of Quantum Foundations.

Powered by WordPress and Path. Back to Top