Primary Menu Search
  • Aims & Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Content
  • Book Reviews
  • Supplement
  • Members
  • Submit
  • Contact IJQF

International Journal of Quantum Foundations

An online forum for exploring the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity

You are here: Home ∼ Relational blockworld: Providing a realist psi-epistemic account of quantum mechanics

Relational blockworld: Providing a realist psi-epistemic account of quantum mechanics

Published by International Journal of Quantum Foundations on June 26, 2015 | 1 Response

Volume 1, Issue 3, pages 123-170

W. M. Stuckey [Show Biography], Michael Silberstein [Show Biography] and Timothy McDevitt [Show Biography]

Mark Stuckey is a Professor of Physics at Elizabethtown College, Pennsylvania, USA. His PhD thesis was in relativistic cosmology from the University of Cincinnati working for Louis Witten in 1987. His work in relativistic cosmology contributed to a movement to correct misconceptions in the mass media and introductory astronomy textbooks about Big Bang cosmology. In 1994 he started study in foundations of physics with the goal of interpreting quantum mechanics in order to develop a new approach to fundamental physics. In 2005, he and a colleague in philosophy of science (Prof. Silberstein) achieved the first part of that goal by creating the Relational Blockworld (RBW) interpretation of quantum mechanics. In 2009, a colleague in mathematics (Prof. McDevitt) joined the collaboration and helped bring the goal to fruition with the development of an RBW approach to quantum gravity and the unification of physics based on modified lattice gauge theory. In 2012, the corresponding modification to Regge calculus in Einstein-deSitter cosmology was used to fit the Union2 Compilation supernova data as well as LambdaCDM without accelerating expansion, dark energy, or a cosmological constant. In 2015, RBW and its associated new approach to fundamental physics are well-developed and being brought to bear on the dark matter problem.
Michael David Silberstein is a Full Professor of Philosophy at Elizabethtown College, a founding member of the Cognitive Science program and permanent Adjunct in the Philosophy Department at the University of Maryland, College Park, where he is also a faculty member in the Foundations of Physics Program and a Fellow on the Committee for Philosophy and the Sciences. His primary research interests are foundations of physics, foundations of cognitive science and foundations of complexity theory respectively. He is especially interested in how these branches of philosophy and science bear on more general questions of reduction, emergence and explanation. In 2005, he and a colleague in physics (Prof. Stuckey) created the Relational Blockworld (RBW) interpretation of quantum mechanics. In 2009, a colleague in mathematics (Prof. McDevitt) joined the collaboration and helped bring to fruition the development of an RBW approach to quantum gravity and the unification of physics based on modified lattice gauge theory. In 2012, the corresponding modification to Regge calculus in Einstein-deSitter cosmology was used to fit the Union2 Compilation supernova data as well as LambdaCDM without accelerating expansion, dark energy, or a cosmological constant. In 2015, RBW and its associated new approach to fundamental physics is being brought to bear on the dark matter problem.
Tim McDevitt is Professor of Mathematics and Chair of the Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences at Elizabethtown College. He earned his Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics in 1996 at the University of Virginia and has spent significant time working both in and outside of academia. He has been at Elizabethown College since 2005 and he enjoys engaging in interdisciplinary research with colleagues in other disciplines.

We update our Relational Blockworld (RBW) explanation of quantum physics and argue that it provides a realist psi-epistemic account of quantum mechanics as called for by Leifer. RBW accomplishes this by employing discrete graphical amalgams of space, time and sources (“spacetimesource elements”) and an adynamical global constraint as ‘hidden variables’ that avoid the need for counterfactual definiteness in a realist account. Instead of an equation of motion governing time-evolved entities, the adynamical global constraint is used for computing the graphical transition amplitude whence a probability amplitude for our fundamental spacetimesource element. We begin with a largely conceptual and philosophical introduction to RBW’s most prominent features, i.e., adynamism, relationalism/contextualism, and the unmediated exchange of energy. This conceptual introduction includes a simple interferometer computation of the relative intensities found in a weak measurement that we compare with the authors’ computation per weak values. We use this to contrast our adynamical explanation of the experiment with the apparently dynamical, retro-time-evolved explanation of the authors’ Two State Vector Formalism. Next we use spacetimesource elements instead of paths in Dowker’s GHZ set-up to contrast RBW with Sorkin’s Many Histories account. We argue that rather than multiple paths per Many Histories, what is called for is no paths per RBW. The adynamical interpretation of these two quantum experiments, afforded by the global perspective, suggests that quantum mechanics might be underwritten adynamically. Thus, in the second part of the paper, we motivate an adynamical global constraint using coupled harmonic oscillators and then apply it to an analysis of the twin-slit experiment. This illustrates how the adynamical global constraint of our “modified lattice gauge theory” underwrites quantum field theory whence quantum mechanics. We conclude with a brief dismissal of the measurement problem and an RBW explanation of entanglement, environmental decoherence, quantum non-commutivity, quantum versus classical behavior, and the Born rule.

Full Text Download (921k) | View Submission Post

Posted in Volume 1, Issue 3, July 2015 Tagged Original Paper

Article written by International Journal of Quantum Foundations

International Journal of Quantum Foundations

← Previous Next →

Latest Issues

  • Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 2, April 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 3, July 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 4, October 2022
  • Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2023
  • Volume 9, Issue 2, April 2023

IJQF Supplement

  • Volume 4, Issue 1, April 2022
  • Volume 4, Issue 2, July 2022
  • Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2023
  • Volume 5, Issue 2, April 2023

IJQF Members

Newest | Active | Popular
  • Profile picture of Sheldon Goldstein
    Sheldon Goldstein
    active 5 hours, 42 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of Lajos Diósi
    Lajos Diósi
    active 5 hours, 42 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of Roger Penrose
    Roger Penrose
    active 5 hours, 42 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of Arthur Fine
    Arthur Fine
    active 5 hours, 42 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of David Deutsch
    David Deutsch
    active 1 day, 7 hours ago

IJQF Forums

Newest | Active | Popular | Alphabetical
  • Group logo of 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem
    2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem
    active 3 months, 2 weeks ago
  • Group logo of 2018 Workshop on Wigner’s Friend
    2018 Workshop on Wigner’s Friend
    active 3 years, 8 months ago
  • Group logo of 2016 International Workshop on Quantum Observers
    2016 International Workshop on Quantum Observers
    active 4 years ago
  • Group logo of 2015 International Workshop on Quantum Foundations
    2015 International Workshop on Quantum Foundations
    active 4 years, 7 months ago
  • Group logo of John Bell Workshop 2014
    John Bell Workshop 2014
    active 5 years, 2 months ago
  • Group logo of 2017 International Workshop: Collapse of the Wave Function
    2017 International Workshop: Collapse of the Wave Function
    active 5 years, 2 months ago

Most Viewed

  • On Testing the Simulation Theory (16,016)
  • 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem (3,318)
  • Latest Papers on Quantum Foundations (1,964)
  • OBITUARY FOR HEINZ-DIETER ZEH (1932 — 2018) (1,623)
  • Non-Relativistic Limit of the Dirac Equation (1,592)
  • International Journal of Quantum Foundations (1,353)
  • Review of “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Exploration of the Physical Meaning of Quantum Theory” (1,164)
  • Taking Heisenberg’s Potentia Seriously (1,055)
  • The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics (939)
  • On testing the simulation hypothesis (906)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Primary Menu

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Content
  • Book Reviews
  • Supplement
  • Members
  • Submit
  • Contact IJQF

Copyright © 2023 International Journal of Quantum Foundations.

Powered by WordPress and Path. Back to Top