• Ruth Kastner posted an update 4 years, 6 months ago

    I recently posted on the arxiv a paper written with John G. Cramer, refuting claims that absorption is not well-defined in the transactional interpretation. Comments welcome.
    It should be noted that TI is not in the class of theories termed ‘spontaneous collapse theories’ (even though it has spontaneous collapse). This term is currently being used to denote models that change the basic Schrodinger (or Heisenberg) evolution, which TI does not do. TI is empirically equivalent to standard QM with a projection postulate (TI derives the projection process rather than having to postulate it).