
Quantum Speculations wrote a new post, Physical Information Generated by Action in Maxwell Fields 8 months, 1 week ago
Volume 4, Issue 1, pages 135
Hans Joachim Dudek
An overview of a new theory of physical information is presented. Starting out from the Lagrange density and from commutators of communication relations of […]

Quantum Speculations wrote a new post, Natural Planck Units and the Structure of Matter and Radiation 1 year, 1 month ago
Volume 3, Issue 3, pages 120
David Humpherys
Planck’s constant and the gravitational constant embody natural units of length, mass, and time. When we replace the universal constants with natural Planck […]

Quantum Speculations wrote a new post, An Explanation of the Double Slit Experiment Based on the Circles Theory 1 year, 8 months ago
Volume 3, Issue 2, pages 3352
Mohammed Sanduk
The circles theory tries to explain the complex functioning of the harmonic oscillator. It is a nonquantum mechanics theory, but it shows a good similarity […]

Quantum Speculations wrote a new post, Time and the Quantum Measurement Problem 1 year, 11 months ago
Volume 3, Issue 1, pages 3243
Ted Dace
function toggleb() {
var ele = document.getElementById(“togglebiography”);
var text = document.getElementById(“displaybiography”);
if(ele.style.display == “block”) { […] 
Ruth Kastner wrote a new post, Revised submission: Decoherence and the Transactional Interpretation 2 years, 8 months ago
In response to reviewer comments, I am posting a sightly revised version of my previously submitted paper. Editor: please note that my emails to you are not getting through at the moment, so please consider this […]

Quantum Speculations wrote a new post, A Hydrogen Atom Model with WellDefined Electron Trajectories 2 years, 11 months ago
Volume 2, Issue 1, pages 126
Thomas Allmendinger
function toggleb() {
var ele = document.getElementById(“togglebiography”);
var text = document.getElementById(“displaybiography”);
if(ele.style.display == […] 
Quantum Speculations wrote a new post, A Dialectical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics 2 years, 11 months ago
Volume 2, Issue 1, pages 2739
Tracy Klein [Show Biography]
function toggleb() {
var ele = document.getElementById(“togglebiography”);
var text = […] 
Ruth Kastner wrote a new post, Decoherence in the Transactional Interpretation 2 years, 11 months ago
Abstract. This paper presents an analysis of decoherence resulting from the physically real nonunitarity, or ‘objective reduction,’ that occurs in the Transactional Interpretation (TI). Two distinct aspects of t […]

Quantum Speculations wrote a new post, Meaning of the Wave Function and the Origin of Probability in Quantum Mechanics 3 years, 2 months ago
Volume 1, Issue 1, pages 3245
GuoQiu Zhao [Show Biography]
function toggleb() {
var ele = document.getElementById(“togglebiography”);
var text = […] 
Quantum Speculations wrote a new post, Causally Active Metaphysical Realism 3 years, 2 months ago
Volume 1, Issue 1, pages 131
Antony Van der Mude [Show Biography]
function toggleb() {
var ele = document.getElementById(“togglebiography”);
var text = […] 
Quantum Speculations wrote a new post, Is There a Physical Reality Beyond the Axioms of Quantum Mechanics? 3 years, 2 months ago
Volume 1, Issue 1, pages 8592
Mohammed Sanduk [Show Biography]
function toggleb1() {
var ele1 = document.getElementById(“togglebiography1”);
var text1 = […] 
Ruth Kastner replied to the topic Quantum theory is incompatible with relativity: A proof beyond Bell's theorem in the forum 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell's theorem 3 years, 3 months ago
Reply to Aurelien: No, RTI has emphatically nothing to do with Bohr or the Copenhagen interpretation, which I criticize and reject here:https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.07545
If you read my publications, you will find that I assign objective physical reality to quantum states and the advanced states. You seem to be implicitly assuming that for something…[Read more] 
Ruth Kastner replied to the topic Quantum theory is incompatible with relativity: A proof beyond Bell's theorem in the forum 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell's theorem 3 years, 3 months ago
To Shan: That is correct. The collapse occurs with respect to projection operators (outer products), not with respect to kets. That is, from absorber response to each component we get two weighted projection operators:Psi1><Psi1 and Psi2><Psi2, where each is weighted by the Born Rule based on the prepared state. So if the prepared state was…[Read more]

Ruth Kastner replied to the topic Quantum theory is incompatible with relativity: A proof beyond Bell's theorem in the forum 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell's theorem 3 years, 3 months ago
Dear Aurelien, RTI does not require any preferred foliation; it does not require any future boundary condition. It is not a hidden variable approach nor does it rely on a notion that measurement outcomes are ‘already there’ in the future–i.e. it is not a block world ontology. I understand that the original TI may have seemed to imply that, but…[Read more]

Ruth Kastner replied to the topic Quantum theory is incompatible with relativity: A proof beyond Bell's theorem in the forum 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell's theorem 3 years, 3 months ago
Thanks Shan. In RTI the quantum state Psi> is fully ontic. But the advanced state <Psi is also fully ontic, so RTI is a different animal from the usual ‘quantum interpretation.’ This is why it is not subject to the dilemma you pose. It has real ontic collapse, but the collapse is not with respect to just a forwardpropagating quantum state. In…[Read more]

Ruth Kastner replied to the topic Quantum theory is incompatible with relativity: A proof beyond Bell's theorem in the forum 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell's theorem 3 years, 3 months ago
Thanks Aurelien, I am indeed aware of the Sutherland model and you are correct that it is covariant, except perhaps for the final boundary condition which has to be defined in a particular frame (but it’s a matter of debate as to whether that ‘really’ fixes a preferred frame). Other than the final B.C., the model preserves full Lorentz covariance.…[Read more]

Ruth Kastner replied to the topic Quantum theory is incompatible with relativity: A proof beyond Bell's theorem in the forum 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell's theorem 3 years, 3 months ago
I’m afraid this is not the correct conclusion. While RTI is certainly not the usual ad hoc collapse theory, it certainly is a nonunitary objective reduction theory (see below). So it cannot be subject to your argument concerning unitaryonly theories. There is real dynamical reduction in TI–it just does not take the form that you’ve assumed…[Read more]

Ruth Kastner replied to the topic Quantum theory is incompatible with relativity: A proof beyond Bell's theorem in the forum 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell's theorem 3 years, 4 months ago
But the existence of the observed correlation does not compel the idea that there is some sort of collapse signal that ‘travels faster than light.’ You might be supposing that such a ‘collapse signal’ is needed to enforce the correlation, but that is not the case in TI, where the correlation is enforced through the combination of the quantum state…[Read more]

Ruth Kastner replied to the topic Quantum theory is incompatible with relativity: A proof beyond Bell's theorem in the forum 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell's theorem 3 years, 4 months ago
Thanks Shan for this question. If the measurement events are spacelike separated, then according to relativity, there is no invariant time order for the two events. That is, it’s not possible to consider them simultaneous in any invariant sense–that would pick out a preferred frame, and relativity doesn’t allow that. For an observer heading…[Read more]

Ruth Kastner replied to the topic Quantum theory is incompatible with relativity: A proof beyond Bell's theorem in the forum 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell's theorem 3 years, 4 months ago
Yes, I think the definition of ‘collapse’–what collapse means physically–does matter for the issue of concern to you. In this latest post you seem to be talking about a single quantum, not an entangled state, right? Bell’s inequality concerns correlations between entangled particles.
In any case, for this singleparticle measurement, the…[Read more]  Load More