Home › Forums › 2015 International Workshop on Quantum Foundations › Retrocausal theories › Possibilist Transactional Interpretation › Reply To: Possibilist Transactional Interpretation
I’ve seen Cramer’s “pseudo-time” process of TI mentioned in several topics of this forum being proposed as a way of introducing change and Becoming to the BW (blockworld). I have no idea what meta-time change means empirically and neither it seems do they. In my opinion, if you want an empirically/experientially meaningful notion of change and Becoming in a retrocausal account, you want PTI. I’ve said as much several times in other topics without once having it acknowledged. I can only assume there is something they dislike about PTI, but they’re being too polite to tell me. Do you know what that is?
Sorry, I’m a bit autistic so I need people to be direct.
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.