Ah, so you understand MWI/Everett as what Allori et al call “Sm” in this paper:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0903.2211.pdf
Is that right? I’m still a little confused by how you talk about the ontology, though. Do you think of the m-field as something like an emergent property of the wave function (such that it, the m-field, doesn’t count as an addition to the ontology beyond the wf)?
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.