Home › Forums › 2015 International Workshop on Quantum Foundations › Retrocausal theories › Thinking about QM as a variational principle (online 7/9 @ 9am UTC-6) › Reply To: Thinking about QM as a variational principle (online 7/9 @ 9am UTC-6)
Well, I don’t think so, but if I’ve misunderstood something I’d appreciate your enlightening me. The point is that if I make a measurement (or prepare a state) at time t1 and again at t2 > t1, with no intervening measurement, then I have no experimental evidence for *how* the system got into the state I observe at t2. The Copenhagen interpretation tells me that it collapsed in an instant, at t2, but if instead I assert (as I do!) that it changed smoothly during the interval (t1,t2), there is no experimental evidence that can prove me wrong. Therefore I conclude that (A) my explanation cannot be refuted by the experimental record and (B) in particular, if there’s any failure of conservation, it can’t be measured.
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.