Reply To: Consistency of the Everett ‘world branching’

Miroljub Dugic

Dear Dieter,

Leaving the details aside [e.g. the hydrogen atom is a paradigmatic illustration, while the QBM model is practically the only elaborated sufficiently ‘macroscopic’ model], I am happy to learn that you agree with the non-objective character of the Everett world branching–which is the only objective of this Topic. With the due respect, while your position is interpretational, our paper brings a technically elaborated proof for the quantum Brownian motion model.

I am sure there are plenty of those who would not accept non-objective ‘branching’ which nevertheless, I agree, completes our discussion.

Best regards,

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.