Reply To: Consistency of the Everett ‘world branching’

H. Dieter Zeh

Dear Miroljub,

my point was that your arguments regarding definitions are correct but irrelevant for the measurement problem in terms of Everett. Nothing ever “branches” objectively in any definition. Instead of repeating my arguments let me invite you to read pp. 14-15 and pp. 18-19 of my first reference.

We may simply be discussing different things.

Best regards

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.