The ontological meaning of the wave function has been debated for many years. A widely-discussed view is wave function realism, according to which the wave function represents a real physical field in a fundamental high-dimensional space. In this paper, I argue that wave function realism is inconsistent with the reality of the global phase. In other words, the global phase cannot be real in wave function realism, and if the global phase is real, then wave function realism will be not true. Moreover, if the global phase is real, then the wave function of an $N$-body system cannot represent a single physical entity, either in a high-dimensional space or in three-dimensional space, but represent $N$ physical entities in three-dimensional space.
Latest Issues
IJQF Supplement
IJQF Members
-
active 8 minutes ago
-
active 21 hours, 43 minutes ago
-
active 21 hours, 43 minutes ago
-
active 21 hours, 43 minutes ago
-
active 21 hours, 43 minutes ago
IJQF Forums
-
active 9 months, 2 weeks ago
-
active 4 years, 1 month ago
-
active 4 years, 6 months ago
-
active 5 years, 1 month ago
-
active 5 years, 8 months ago
-
active 5 years, 8 months ago
Most Viewed
- On Testing the Simulation Theory (16,870)
- 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem (3,443)
- Latest Papers on Quantum Foundations (2,048)
- OBITUARY FOR HEINZ-DIETER ZEH (1932 — 2018) (1,773)
- Non-Relativistic Limit of the Dirac Equation (1,733)
- International Journal of Quantum Foundations (1,515)
- Review of “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Exploration of the Physical Meaning of Quantum Theory” (1,261)
- Taking Heisenberg’s Potentia Seriously (1,193)
- The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics (1,005)
- On testing the simulation hypothesis (994)