Primary Menu Search
  • Aims & Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Content
  • Book Reviews
  • Supplement
  • Members
  • Submit
  • Contact IJQF

International Journal of Quantum Foundations

An online forum for exploring the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity

You are here: Home ∼ Invalidity of the Standard Locality Condition for Hidden-Variable Models of EPR-Bohm Experiments

Invalidity of the Standard Locality Condition for Hidden-Variable Models of EPR-Bohm Experiments

Published by International Journal of Quantum Foundations on October 2, 2019

Volume 5, Issue 4, pages 115-133

James L. Beck [Show Biography]

James L. Beck is the George W. Housner Professor of Engineering and Applied Science, Emeritus, at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech). He is a native of New Zealand, which is a seismically active country. As a result, while working for the New Zealand government’s Physics and Engineering Laboratory after completing his BSc in Mathematics and Physics and his MSc in Mathematics at the University of Auckland, he became interested in models to predict the dynamic response of novel civil structures under earthquakes. He then joined the PhD program in earthquake engineering at Caltech where he received his PhD in Civil Engineering in 1978. He has been a professor in Caltech’s Division of Engineering and Applied Science since 1981. Much of Prof. Beck’s research over the last two decades has focused on the development of theory and algorithms, and their application, to utilizing sensor data from complex dynamical systems in order to improve models for predicting their dynamic response and their state of health. For this, he developed a Bayesian probabilistic framework for treating the uncertainty in the modeling of both the dynamic behavior of complex real systems and the future excitation that they might experience. This work dove-tailed well with his long interest in probability and its philosophical foundations. Despite his university training in probability and statistics being exclusively based on a frequentist interpretation of probability, his studies led Prof. Beck to favor a specific Bayesian interpretation of the axioms of probability where it is viewed as a multi-valued conditional logic for quantitative plausible reasoning. This probability logic interpretation builds on the seminal work of the physicists Richard T. Cox and Edwin T. Jaynes. Since his undergraduate days, Prof. Beck has been intrigued by puzzling features of quantum mechanics, despite understanding the mathematics of it. A few years ago he decided to focus some of his research efforts on the foundations of quantum mechanics. His belief is that some of its perceived strangeness, such as quantum nonlocality, is not intrinsic to it but is a result of the wide-spread use of the frequentist interpretation of the probability distributions produced by quantum theory. This thesis is evident in the current paper on the invalidity of the standard probabilistic locality condition for hidden-variable models for the spin outcomes in the EPR-Bohm experiments. The arguments in this paper demonstrate that how probability is interpreted is critical for understanding quantum entanglement and locality, as well as breaking the logical connection between hidden-variable models and Bell inequalities, which has non-trivial implications.

John Bell and others used a locality condition to establish inequalities that they believe must be satisfied by any local hidden-variable model for the spin probability distribution for two entangled particles in an EPR-Bohm experiment. We show that this condition is invalid because it contradicts the product rule of probability theory for any model that exhibits the quantum theory property of perfect correlation. This breaks the connection between Bell inequalities and the existence of any local hidden-variable model of interest. As already known, these inequalities give necessary conditions for the existence of third/fourth-order joint probability distributions for the spin outcomes from three/four separate EPR-Bohm experimental set-ups that are consistent with the second-order joint spin distributions for each experiment after marginalization. If a Bell inequality is violated, as quantum mechanics theory predicts and experiments show can happen, then at least one third-order joint probability is negative. However, this does not imply anything about the existence of local hidden-variable models for the second-order joint probability distributions for the spin outcomes of a single experiment. The locality condition does seem reasonable under the widely-applied frequentist interpretation of the spin probability distributions that views them as real properties of a random process that are manifested through their relative frequency of occurrence, which gives conditioning in the probabilities for the spin outcomes a causal role. In contrast, under the Bayesian interpretation of probability, probabilistic conditioning on one particle’s spin outcome in the product rule is viewed as information to make probabilistic predictions of the other particle’s spin outcome. There is nothing causal and so no reason to develop a locality condition. Thus, how probability is to be interpreted is critical to understanding quantum entanglement and locality.

Full Text Download (267k)

Posted in Volume 5, Issue 4, October 2019 Tagged Original Paper

Article written by International Journal of Quantum Foundations

International Journal of Quantum Foundations

← Previous Next →

Latest Issues

  • Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 2, April 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 3, July 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 4, October 2022
  • Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2023

IJQF Supplement

  • Volume 4, Issue 1, April 2022
  • Volume 4, Issue 2, July 2022
  • Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2023

IJQF Members

Newest | Active | Popular
  • Profile picture of Sheldon Goldstein
    Sheldon Goldstein
    active 12 hours, 4 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of Lajos Diósi
    Lajos Diósi
    active 12 hours, 4 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of Roger Penrose
    Roger Penrose
    active 12 hours, 4 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of Arthur Fine
    Arthur Fine
    active 12 hours, 4 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of Andrew Whitaker
    Andrew Whitaker
    active 2 days, 3 hours ago

IJQF Forums

Newest | Active | Popular | Alphabetical
  • Group logo of 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem
    2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem
    active 1 month, 3 weeks ago
  • Group logo of 2018 Workshop on Wigner’s Friend
    2018 Workshop on Wigner’s Friend
    active 3 years, 6 months ago
  • Group logo of 2016 International Workshop on Quantum Observers
    2016 International Workshop on Quantum Observers
    active 3 years, 10 months ago
  • Group logo of 2015 International Workshop on Quantum Foundations
    2015 International Workshop on Quantum Foundations
    active 4 years, 6 months ago
  • Group logo of John Bell Workshop 2014
    John Bell Workshop 2014
    active 5 years ago
  • Group logo of 2017 International Workshop: Collapse of the Wave Function
    2017 International Workshop: Collapse of the Wave Function
    active 5 years ago

Most Viewed

  • On Testing the Simulation Theory (15,756)
  • 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem (3,282)
  • Latest Papers on Quantum Foundations (1,937)
  • Non-Relativistic Limit of the Dirac Equation (1,578)
  • OBITUARY FOR HEINZ-DIETER ZEH (1932 — 2018) (1,563)
  • International Journal of Quantum Foundations (1,323)
  • Review of “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Exploration of the Physical Meaning of Quantum Theory” (1,138)
  • Taking Heisenberg’s Potentia Seriously (1,020)
  • The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics (911)
  • On testing the simulation hypothesis (878)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Primary Menu

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Content
  • Book Reviews
  • Supplement
  • Members
  • Submit
  • Contact IJQF

Copyright © 2023 International Journal of Quantum Foundations.

Powered by WordPress and Path. Back to Top