Primary Menu Search
  • Aims & Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Content
  • Book Reviews
  • Supplement
  • Members
  • Submit
  • Contact IJQF

International Journal of Quantum Foundations

An online forum for exploring the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity

You are here: Home ∼ Are Retrocausal Accounts of Entanglement Unnaturally Fine-Tuned?

Are Retrocausal Accounts of Entanglement Unnaturally Fine-Tuned?

Published by International Journal of Quantum Foundations on December 27, 2015

Volume 2, Issue 1, pages 1-16

D. Almada, K. Ch’ng, S. Kintner, B. Morrison and K. B. Wharton [Show Biography]

Ken Wharton received his physics degrees from Stanford and UCLA, and is now a full professor at San Jose State University; his co-authors are current or former students at SJSU. Wharton’s early research concerned experimental laser-plasma interactions, but for the past decade he has specialized in quantum foundations. A member of the Foundational Questions Institute, Wharton spends some of his efforts on popular outreach (general-level essays, a piece in New Scientist, an appearance on Through The Wormhole, etc.) His current research is focused on developing explanations for quantum phenomena using only continuous structures in ordinary spacetime.

An explicit retrocausal model is used to analyze the general Wood-Spekkens argument that any causal explanation of Bell-inequality violations must be unnaturally fine-tuned to avoid signaling. The no-signaling aspects of the model turn out to be robust under variation of the only free parameter, even as the probabilities deviate from standard quantum theory. The ultimate reason for this robustness is then traced to a symmetry assumed by the original model. A broader conclusion is that symmetry-based restrictions seem a natural and acceptable form of fine-tuning, not an unnatural model-rigging. And if the Wood-Spekkens argument is indicating the presence of hidden symmetries, this might even be interpreted as supporting time-symmetric retrocausal models.

Full Text Download (228k) | View Submission Post

Posted in Volume 2, Issue 1, January 2016 Tagged Original Paper

Article written by International Journal of Quantum Foundations

International Journal of Quantum Foundations

← Previous Next →

Latest Issues

  • Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 2, April 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 3, July 2022
  • Volume 8, Issue 4, October 2022
  • Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2023

IJQF Supplement

  • Volume 4, Issue 1, April 2022
  • Volume 4, Issue 2, July 2022
  • Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2023

IJQF Members

Newest | Active | Popular
  • Profile picture of Sheldon Goldstein
    Sheldon Goldstein
    active 11 hours, 48 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of Lajos Diósi
    Lajos Diósi
    active 11 hours, 48 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of Roger Penrose
    Roger Penrose
    active 11 hours, 48 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of Arthur Fine
    Arthur Fine
    active 11 hours, 48 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of Andrew Whitaker
    Andrew Whitaker
    active 2 days, 2 hours ago

IJQF Forums

Newest | Active | Popular | Alphabetical
  • Group logo of 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem
    2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem
    active 1 month, 3 weeks ago
  • Group logo of 2018 Workshop on Wigner’s Friend
    2018 Workshop on Wigner’s Friend
    active 3 years, 6 months ago
  • Group logo of 2016 International Workshop on Quantum Observers
    2016 International Workshop on Quantum Observers
    active 3 years, 10 months ago
  • Group logo of 2015 International Workshop on Quantum Foundations
    2015 International Workshop on Quantum Foundations
    active 4 years, 6 months ago
  • Group logo of John Bell Workshop 2014
    John Bell Workshop 2014
    active 5 years ago
  • Group logo of 2017 International Workshop: Collapse of the Wave Function
    2017 International Workshop: Collapse of the Wave Function
    active 5 years ago

Most Viewed

  • On Testing the Simulation Theory (15,756)
  • 2019 International Workshop: Beyond Bell’s theorem (3,282)
  • Latest Papers on Quantum Foundations (1,937)
  • Non-Relativistic Limit of the Dirac Equation (1,578)
  • OBITUARY FOR HEINZ-DIETER ZEH (1932 — 2018) (1,563)
  • International Journal of Quantum Foundations (1,323)
  • Review of “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Exploration of the Physical Meaning of Quantum Theory” (1,138)
  • Taking Heisenberg’s Potentia Seriously (1,020)
  • The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics (911)
  • On testing the simulation hypothesis (878)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Primary Menu

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Content
  • Book Reviews
  • Supplement
  • Members
  • Submit
  • Contact IJQF

Copyright © 2023 International Journal of Quantum Foundations.

Powered by WordPress and Path. Back to Top